Your Questions Answered: 2025 Immigration Guide for Florence, Alabama

The immigration landscape in 2025 is undergoing significant changes, with new policies, regulations, and opportunities shaping the path for those seeking residency or citizenship in the United States. At La Raza Legal, we understand just how daunting this process can be, especially with current immigration policies shaped by the Trump administration. For immigrants in Florence, Alabama, it is crucial to have access to reliable legal resources and support during this time. Changes in administration can bring about various updates that may affect your case, leading to confusion and uncertainty.

That’s why we’ve created a comprehensive FAQ guide—to address your most pressing questions and provide the clarity you need to move forward with confidence. Whether you’re applying for a visa, working to reunite with loved ones, or looking for guidance on the asylum process, our team is here to provide the knowledge and support you deserve.

We go beyond providing legal support—we stand by your side as advocates, dedicated to empowering our community and ensuring that your voice is heard in this complex system.

1. What does the February 2025 visa bulletin mean for sponsored families and employment-based visas, Florence? 

   
   

The February 2025 visa bulletin has brought some unexpected changes, particularly for individuals in certain categories. One significant update affects candidates applying under Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS). Unfortunately, this category has shifted back to 2019, creating a backlog for visas. For those impacted, this means the wait to become eligible for adjustment of status—obtaining a permanent resident card—will now take longer than previously anticipated.

For context, SIJS candidates are young individuals who have entered the United States and petitioned a court for guardianship or dependency. In these cases, the court determines that returning to their home country would not be in their best interest because conditions in their home country are unsafe, the minor is dependent on the state or needs a legal guardian, and that reunification with both or one of the parents are not possible due to abuse, neglect, or abandonment.

With this court order, they can apply for deferred action, which provides them with certain protections while they await permanent residency.

These individuals closely follow the visa bulletin, particularly category three. Recently, this category had been set to 2020, but it has now reverted to 2019. As a result, individuals who didn’t file before 2019 are unable to proceed with obtaining permanent residency at this time.

2. How do the recent cuts to legal aid impact unaccompanied minors at the border?

   
   

Unaccompanied minors arriving in the United States face a unique set of challenges, and unlike adults, they are not held in detention centers. Instead, these children are placed in specialized facilities, often described as halfway houses, designed to provide them with care and support during an inherently difficult time. These facilities have historically received significant funding to ensure that these vulnerable minors have access to essential services, including medical screenings, educational assessments, and mental health support, such as psychiatric evaluations. They are housed temporarily while efforts are made to locate a family member or responsible individual within the United States to take custody of them.

However, the recent cuts to legal aid raise serious concerns about the future of these crucial services. While the immediate impact on unaccompanied minors already in the U.S. may be limited, the long-term consequences could significantly affect how new arrivals at the border are cared for and supported. Reduced funding may mean fewer resources for these children, potentially limiting their access to the compassionate and comprehensive care they need.

3. What are the changes to DHS enforcement priorities, and how might they impact individuals in Florence with pending immigration applications?

   
   

Recent changes indicate that any undocumented individual may now be considered a priority for DHS enforcement. High-priority cases include but are not limited to those who entered the United States within the last two years, as they are subject to expedited removal. This process allows for deportation without appearing before a judge, which can feel deeply unsettling and overwhelming. If you or someone you know fears returning to their home country, it is crucial to express this fear immediately if they find themselves in custody of DHS (ICE) or CBP. Doing so may activate important legal protections, such as a credible fear interview, which can be a vital step in seeking safety.

Unfortunately, even individuals with some form of deferred status or pending applications, such as deferred action, TPS, parole, or asylum, appear to be under increased scrutiny. DHS is reportedly pursuing these cases, which may involve detaining or even arresting individuals. While this situation can understandably feel alarming, please know that you are not alone. We are here to guide you through this process and advocate for your rights.

Enforcement decisions often consider factors such as how long someone has been in the United States. Those who entered within the last two years may face expedited removal, but others may be released with a court date or placed under supervision with regular check-ins with ICE. Every case is unique, and we are committed to providing you with the personalized support and expertise you need during this challenging time.

4. How are the new administrative actions on deportations affecting immigrants and families in Florence? 

   
   

The recent changes in enforcement priorities by the new administration have understandably caused significant concern within the community, especially for individuals who are undocumented or lack legal status to reside permanently in the United States. These individuals now face an increased risk of detention, leaving many families feeling fearful and uncertain about their future. 

At our firm, we are committed to supporting our clients during these challenging times. We are actively offering consultations to help individuals understand their constitutional rights and advising them on steps they can take to protect themselves and their loved ones. While specific numbers or personal accounts from Florence, Alabama, remain limited, it's evident that the heightened enforcement is creating a ripple effect of fear throughout the community. Children are afraid to attend school, families hesitate to go to church, and many avoid public spaces, including work, out of concern that ICE might be present. 

Although we have not observed ICE operations in Florence itself, they have been more noticeable in larger cities. The rhetoric from the president and the administration has amplified fears by portraying ICE as aggressively pursuing "criminal aliens." When ICE targets an individual, it often leads to the detention of others nearby who lack proper documentation. This practice creates widespread fear and upheaval within our community.

For those with pending applications or cases in immigration court, we strongly encourage you to carry proof of your status at all times. Understanding how to clearly explain your case and its current status to an ICE officer can make a significant difference in avoiding unnecessary detentions. 

5. What should individuals in Florence do if their immigration judge is replaced due to firings by Trump's DOJ? 

   
   

We understand how unsettling changes in the immigration court system can be, but we want to reassure you that in most cases, individuals may not even be immediately aware if their immigration judge is replaced. If this happens, it’s important to know that the immigration system is already facing significant challenges, with a reported backlog of nearly 3.5 million cases. When a judge is removed, their caseload is reassigned to other judges, which could mean your case might be transferred to a new judge. 

In immigration court, judges hold a great deal of discretion, particularly in cases involving forms of relief like asylum or cancellation of removal. While every judge is bound by the law, they also have the authority to make decisions based on their interpretation and discretion. Some judges are known to be stricter, while others take a more flexible approach. This variation can influence the outcome of a case. For instance, if an individual initially had a lenient judge and their case is transferred to a stricter one, it could affect the final decision. 

That’s why we believe preparation is key. As attorneys, we make it a priority to understand the tendencies of each judge—whether they're stricter, more flexible, or somewhere in between. We share these insights with our clients to help them feel informed and prepared. This approach isn’t unique to immigration law but is common in state and federal courts as well. By understanding the nuances of your assigned judge, we aim to empower you and reduce uncertainty in what can be a challenging process. 

The broader concern with the removal of judges is its impact on the already overwhelming backlog. If judges are fired and not replaced, the existing delays in the system will only worsen, leaving individuals and families in limbo for even longer periods. While consistency and adherence to the law are critical for immigration judges, the current system also allows for some flexibility in how relief is granted. However, without hiring additional judges to manage the growing caseload, these challenges will only become more severe. 

6. What challenges might immigrants in Alabama face with the introduction of stricter state-level immigration laws? Similar measures have recently been adopted in Texas and Florida, but will Alabama take a different approach? 

   
   

Legislation proposed in Alabama shares notable similarities with laws seen in states like Georgia and Texas. This isn’t new territory for Alabama, which has a history of controversial immigration legislation, such as the 2012 law that sought to criminalize aiding undocumented immigrants. However, these types of laws often encounter significant legal and constitutional hurdles, and it’s essential to examine their broader implications. 

One concerning proposal, SB 55, aims to invalidate out-of-state driver’s licenses unless the holder can prove legal residency. This raises substantial constitutional concerns, particularly with the Full Faith and Credit Clause, which requires states to recognize the legal acts of others. SB 55 would effectively deny recognition of licenses issued by other states, undermining the principle that allows residents of different states to rely on their home state licenses when traveling or relocating.

While Alabama may not agree with certain policies of other states, the Constitution mandates respect for these legal instruments as part of our union. Without safeguards to align with this clause, such a law would face serious constitutional challenges.

Another proposed measure, SB 53, criminalizes the harboring or transportation of undocumented immigrants and encourages individuals to report suspected cases. This raises pressing ethical and legal questions. How can someone reliably discern another person’s immigration status without resorting to unfair assumptions or discriminatory practices? SB 53, often referred to as the "anti-harboring law," risks fostering harmful profiling by relying on superficial factors like appearance or language, which can lead to discrimination. These provisions are not only difficult to enforce fairly but also create an environment of mistrust and fear within our communities.

Perhaps most troubling is SB 63, which would require fingerprints and DNA collection from non-citizens taken into custody. While fingerprinting is routine in criminal proceedings, DNA collection is typically reserved for severe crimes and requires legal oversight. Mandating DNA collection for non-citizens as a standard process could violate Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful searches and seizures. Such an intrusive measure would likely face significant legal opposition, as it conflicts with federal constitutional protections. States may exercise rights under the Tenth Amendment, but these rights cannot override fundamental safeguards like those provided by the Fourth Amendment. 

At its core, these proposals raise critical questions about fairness, constitutional integrity, and the treatment of immigrants in Alabama. Although the state seems to be following trends seen in Texas and Florida, these measures are likely to face serious legal and ethical challenges. Laws that target individuals based on immigration status—or, inherently, a person's appearance or spoken language—not only risk being overturned but, more importantly, undermine the principles of equality and justice that should underpin every legal system.

7. What options are available for immigrants detained during DHS (ICE) check-ins or court hearings in Alabama? And how can La Raza Legal provide support? 

   
   

If you or a loved one is attending an ICE check-in and there’s concern about possible detention, consulting with an attorney beforehand can make all the difference. At La Raza Legal, we’re here to help you understand your situation and prepare for what’s ahead. During a consultation, we carefully assess whether ICE has grounds to detain, such as a prior removal order or specific circumstances in your case, and we help you prepare for the interaction. 

Our goal is to equip you with the knowledge and confidence to navigate this process. We’ll guide you on what to expect, what to say, and how to approach the meeting. If requested, we can also accompany you to your ICE check-in, ensuring you’re not facing this alone. With our experience and understanding of these situations, we can communicate directly with ICE officers, advocating on your behalf and working to achieve the best possible outcome. While we do have a rapport with some individual agents, our extensive experience allows us to navigate these interactions effectively and professionally. 

We know how overwhelming this process can feel, but you don’t have to go through it alone. By choosing legal representation, you’ll have a trusted ally by your side to assess risks, protect your rights, and ensure you’re as prepared as possible. At La Raza Legal, we’re committed to standing with you every step of the way.

8. What options for relief are available to crime victims in Alabama under U visas, and how can they protect their rights?

   
   

Victims of certain crimes in Alabama, particularly those eligible for U visas, have specific pathways to protection and relief. U visas are designed for individuals who have suffered substantial harm as a result of qualifying crimes, such as attempted murder, rape, or extortion. These visas provide a way for victims to seek justice while also safeguarding their own well-being.

If you are a victim of a crime that is not an immediate emergency (i.e., not a 911 situation), it’s important to consult with an experienced attorney before contacting law enforcement. An attorney can guide you through the reporting process while ensuring your rights and safety are protected. This step is especially crucial in light of recent federal policies that encourage local law enforcement to collaborate with federal immigration authorities. In some cases, federal funding has been tied to these collaborations, creating additional risks for undocumented individuals who come forward to report crimes.

Understandably, these policies have caused fear and hesitation among undocumented individuals, who may worry that seeking help from the police could lead to questions about their immigration status, detention, or even deportation. Proposed legislation, like HB 53, which mandates law enforcement to report suspected undocumented individuals, has further heightened these concerns.

We recognize the difficult position victims face when deciding whether to report a crime. While the system is far from perfect, seeking guidance from an attorney can help. Legal experts can provide advice tailored to your situation, helping you navigate this challenging process with greater confidence and security. At the heart of this approach is a commitment to ensuring that victims of crimes feel supported and protected, even in the face of adversity.

9. What should local Alabama employers consider in light of the recent policy changes when hiring? 

   
   

Hiring in today’s evolving legal landscape can be challenging, but it’s essential for local Alabama employers to stay fully compliant with all hiring regulations. This includes verifying immigration status, accurately completing I-9 forms, and understanding legislation like SB 53. Employers involved in transporting individuals to job sites or facilities should take extra care, as SB 53 could create legal risks related to harboring individuals without legal status.

Unfortunately, some employers may unintentionally overlook proper vetting through I-9 forms or fail to request proof of legal status, which can leave them vulnerable to serious consequences. Our team is here to help. We provide personalized support to educate employers on how to verify immigration status, correctly file I-9 forms, and fully understand their compliance obligations. 

For immigrants in our community, the diversity visa lottery offers a rare chance to secure legal status, though its availability is extremely limited. While we have successfully guided clients through this process, the small number of visas means it may not be a viable option for many. 

10. What legal options are available for families in Florence, Alabama, facing separation due to deportation or detention? 

    
    

Deportation and detention can be overwhelming for families, often involving complex legal processes that are difficult to navigate alone. It’s important to know that there are rights and options available to help, and we are here to support you every step of the way. While each case is unique, understanding the laws and processes is the first step toward protecting your loved ones and keeping families together. 

When someone is detained—whether after a traffic stop or an alleged criminal charge—local authorities, such as sheriffs or jails, are required by law to hold that individual for no more than 48 hours while waiting for ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) to take custody. During this time, local authorities must determine if ICE should even be notified. If someone is held beyond 48 hours without legal justification or if ICE should not have been contacted at all, that detention is unlawful. In such situations, it’s critical to seek help from an immigration attorney immediately. A lawyer can file a habeas petition to challenge the detention and work toward securing the release of your loved one. 

For families dealing with wrongful deportations, such as expedited removals when they were not eligible, there are legal mechanisms to challenge these errors. While the process can be complex, it’s possible to pursue a lawsuit to correct mistakes made during deportation proceedings and, in some cases, bring individuals back to the United States. 

If a person is in ICE custody, there are additional factors to consider when determining if they may be eligible for release on bond. A thorough legal review is necessary to evaluate the allegations against them, especially in cases involving crimes that require mandatory detention. For instance, under the recent Laken Riley Act, individuals accused of serious crimes like theft are subject to mandatory detention and cannot qualify for bond. In these situations, individuals must resolve their immigration court cases while remaining in custody. 

For families, time is of the essence. Reaching out to a trusted immigration attorney as soon as possible is crucial. An experienced lawyer can assess the details of the case, determine whether the detention is lawful, and explore options for relief. Every case is different, and having a reliable legal advocate by your side can make all the difference. 

We also encourage families to prepare for unexpected situations involving detention or deportation. For undocumented individuals with U.S. citizen children or significant property in the United States, proactive planning is key to protecting loved ones. Working with an immigration attorney can help you put measures in place, such as drafting powers of attorney, establishing guardianship for children, or creating an estate plan. These steps provide peace of mind and ensure your family is cared for, no matter what happens.

Our team is dedicated to providing compassionate, expert guidance to help you protect your rights and plan for the future. If you or a loved one is dealing with detention, deportation, or any immigration-related concern, do not hesitate to reach out. We are here to stand by your side and fight for the best possible outcome. Contact La Raza Legal today to schedule a consultation and take the next step toward securing your family’s stability and peace of mind.

Disclaimer: The information provided in this guide is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. For specific legal guidance regarding your situation, please consult a licensed attorney.